Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62021TN0628

    Case T-628/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Tequila Revolución v EUIPO — Horizons Group (London) (Revolution Vodka)

    OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 49–50 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    6.12.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 490/49

    Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Tequila Revolución v EUIPO — Horizons Group (London) (Revolution Vodka)

    (Case T-628/21)

    (2021/C 490/59)

    Language in which the application was lodged: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Tequila Revolución (Mexico City, Mexico) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Horizons Group (London) Ltd (Reading, United Kingdom)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark Revolution Vodka — Application for registration No 17 948 886

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2021 in Case R 2266/2020-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    find that the contested decision unfounded;

    —

    find that the contested decision must be annulled and that the use of the applicant’s trade mark is real and sufficient;

    —

    where appropriate, find that the opposition to the trade mark Revolution Vodka is well founded;

    —

    order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top