Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0531

    Case T-531/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Wolf Oil v EUIPO — Rolf Lubricants (ROLF) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ROLF — Earlier international mark Wolf — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard)

    OJ C 329, 16.8.2021, p. 29–30 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.8.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 329/29


    Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Wolf Oil v EUIPO — Rolf Lubricants (ROLF)

    (Case T-531/20) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark ROLF - Earlier international mark Wolf - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard)

    (2021/C 329/39)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Wolf Oil Corporation NV (Hemiksem, Belgium) (represented by: T. Heremans and L. Depypere, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Kompari and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Rolf Lubricants GmbH (Leverkusen, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and S. Sullivan, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2020 (Case R 1958/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Wolf Oil Corporation and Rolf Lubricants.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Wolf Oil Corporation NV to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 339, 12.10.2020.


    Top