This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0058
Case T-58/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-58/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Case T-58/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
OJ C 463, 5.12.2022, pp. 42–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 463/42 |
Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH)
(Case T-58/22) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2022/C 463/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Miroslav Labaš (Košice, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Vasiľ, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and T. Klee, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 November 2021 (Case R 610/2021-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Miroslav Labaš to pay the costs. |