EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0219

Case T-219/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — JK v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Commission staff working for the EEAS — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Implied decision rejecting the request — Decision rejecting the complaint — Article 90 of the Staff Regulations — Competent Appointing Authority — Principle of sound administration)

OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 37–37 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

6.12.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 490/37


Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — JK v Commission

(Case T-219/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Commission staff working for the EEAS - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Implied decision rejecting the request - Decision rejecting the complaint - Article 90 of the Staff Regulations - Competent Appointing Authority - Principle of sound administration)

(2021/C 490/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: JK (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 5 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the implied decision of the European Commission of 5 June 2019 rejecting JK’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

2.

Orders the Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by JK.


(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.


Top