Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CB0081

Case C-81/20: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Fundamental rights — Principle of ne bis in idem — Both criminal and administrative penalties — Not applicable — Ancillary tax liabilities — Interest on a sum paid by the taxpayer in the context of criminal proceedings)

OJ C 382, 20.9.2021, p. 5–5 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

20.9.2021   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/5


Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

(Case C-81/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Fundamental rights - Principle of ne bis in idem - Both criminal and administrative penalties - Not applicable - Ancillary tax liabilities - Interest on a sum paid by the taxpayer in the context of criminal proceedings)

(2021/C 382/05)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Mitliv Exim SRL

Defendants: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală, Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the order

Articles 2 and 63 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, where taxable transactions have taken place and the related value added tax is chargeable, a payment made, even provisionally, seeking to honour the corresponding tax claim cannot be regarded as unfair and cannot generate interest to the benefit of the taxpayer who made that payment.


(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.


Top