Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2019:406:TOC

    Official Journal of the European Union, C 406, 2 December 2019


    Display all documents published in this Official Journal
     

    ISSN 1977-091X

    Official Journal

    of the European Union

    C 406

    European flag  

    English edition

    Information and Notices

    Volume 62
    2 December 2019


    Contents

    page

     

    IV   Notices

     

    NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

     

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    2019/C 406/01

    Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

    1

     

    Court of Justice

    2019/C 406/02

    Appointment of the First Advocate General

    2

    2019/C 406/03

    Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (urgent preliminary ruling procedure)

    2

    2019/C 406/04

    Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 193 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (review of decisions given on appeal)

    2

    2019/C 406/05

    Election of the Presidents of the Chambers of three Judges

    2

    2019/C 406/06

    Taking of the oath by new Members of the Court

    3

    2019/C 406/07

    Assignment of Judges to Chambers

    3

    2019/C 406/08

    Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

    3

     

    General Court

    2019/C 406/09

    Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court

    6


     

    V   Announcements

     

    COURT PROCEEDINGS

     

    Court of Justice

    2019/C 406/10

    Case C-228/19 P: Appeal brought on 13 March 2019 by ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-368/18, ETI Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v EUIPO — Grupo Bimbo (ETI Bumbo)

    7

    2019/C 406/11

    Case C-278/19 P: Appeal brought on 3 April 2019 by Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 17 January 2019 in Case T-576/17, Mas Que Vinos Global, S.L. v EUIPO — JESA (EL SEÑORITO)

    7

    2019/C 406/12

    Case C-295/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Apple Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2019 in Case T-215/17: Pear Technologies v EUIPO - Apple (PEAR)

    8

    2019/C 406/13

    Case C-585/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2019 — Academia de Studii Economice din București v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale

    8

    2019/C 406/14

    Case C-619/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 19 August 2019 — Land Baden-Württemberg v D.R.

    9

    2019/C 406/15

    Case C-635/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi (Spain) lodged on 26 August 2019 — Confederación Sindical Comisiones Obreras de Euskadi v Ayuntamiento de Arrigorriaga

    10

    2019/C 406/16

    Case C-644/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia (Romania) lodged on 28 August 2019 — FT v Universitatea ‘Lucian Blaga’ Sibiu, GS and Others, and Ministerul Educației Naționale

    10

    2019/C 406/17

    Case C-645/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 30 August 2019 — Facebook Ireland Limited, Facebook Inc., Facebook Belgium BVBA v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit

    11

    2019/C 406/18

    Case C-654/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 3 September 2019 — FP Passenger Service v Austrian Airlines AG

    12

    2019/C 406/19

    Case C-657/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2019 —Tax Office D v E

    13

    2019/C 406/20

    Case C-661/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 6 September 2019 — flightright GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG

    13

    2019/C 406/21

    Case C-667/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 September 2019 — A.M. v E.M.

    14

    2019/C 406/22

    Case C-695/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 20 September 2019 — Rádio Popular — Electrodomésticos, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

    15

    2019/C 406/23

    Case C-699/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Quanta Storage, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2019 in Case T-772/15: Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission

    16

    2019/C 406/24

    Case C-701/19 P: Appeal brought on 20 September 2019 by Pilatus Bank plc against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2019 in Case T-687/18: Pilatus Bank v European Central Bank (ECB)

    17

    2019/C 406/25

    Case C-711/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH and Others

    18

     

    General Court

    2019/C 406/26

    Case T-615/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — LL v Parliament (Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Limitation)

    19

    2019/C 406/27

    Case T-125/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — BASF Grenzach v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Triclosan — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial nature of the procedure — Scope of the review — Intensity of the review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — First sentence of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Relevant information — Proportionality — Article 25 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Data obtained under relevant circumstances — Persistence — Neurotoxicity — Reproductive toxicity — Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 — Delay in the submission of a scientific opinion)

    20

    2019/C 406/28

    Case T-467/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 —Barata v Parliament (Action for annulment — Civil service — Selection procedure for contract staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest EP/CAST/S/16/2016 — Drivers — Practical and theoretical tests organised following the establishment of a database — Failure in the theoretical test — Annulment of the call for expressions of interest and voiding of the database — Action which has become devoid of purpose — Continuing interest in bringing proceedings — No need, in part, to adjudicate — Inadmissibility in part)

    21

    2019/C 406/29

    Case T-610/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — ICL-IP Terneuzen and ICL Europe Coöperatief v Commission (REACH — Substances subject to authorisation — Inclusion of 1-bromoproprane (nPB) in Annex XIV to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Volumes — Registration dossier — Data — Substance grouping — Principle of sound administration — Right to conduct business and pursue a trade freely — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

    22

    2019/C 406/30

    Case T-636/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — PlasticsEurope v ECHA (REACH — Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list — Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality)

    22

    2019/C 406/31

    Case T-650/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Jinan Meide Casting v Commission (Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury)

    23

    2019/C 406/32

    Case T-673/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU)

    24

    2019/C 406/33

    Case T-674/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU)

    25

    2019/C 406/34

    Case T-696/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Havenbedrijf Antwerpen and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven v Commission (State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Separable nature — Selective nature — Request for a transitional period)

    26

    2019/C 406/35

    Case T-755/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 –Germany v ECHA (REACH — Evaluation of substances — Benpat — Persistence — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial procedure — Nature of review — Intensity of review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Conferral of powers on EU agencies — Principle of conferral — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)

    27

    2019/C 406/36

    Case T-783/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 – GE Healthcare v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Suspension of the marketing authorisation for gadolinium-containing contrast agents — Articles 31 and 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC — Precautionary principle — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Impartiality)

    28

    2019/C 406/37

    Case T-47/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — UZ v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary sanction — Downgrading by one grade and resetting of promotion points to zero — Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance — Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out — Requirement of impartiality — Right to be heard — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the procedural irregularity)

    28

    2019/C 406/38

    Case T-287/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    29

    2019/C 406/39

    Case T-288/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark NATURE’S VARIETY INSTINCT — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    30

    2019/C 406/40

    Case T-367/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Marijn van Oosten Holding (UKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark UKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    31

    2019/C 406/41

    Case T-378/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — NHS v EUIPO — HLC SB Distribution (CRUZADE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CRUZADE — Earlier EU figurative mark SANTA CRUZ — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark)

    31

    2019/C 406/42

    Case T-716/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier international figurative mark IDÉA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    32

    2019/C 406/43

    Case T-67/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — Sixsigma Networks Mexico v EUIPO — Dokkio (DOKKIO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark DOKKIO — Earlier EU figurative mark representing two diagonal lines followed by a vertical line and a circle — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    33

    2019/C 406/44

    Case T-632/19: Action brought on 23 September 2019 – DD v FRA

    34

    2019/C 406/45

    Case T-640/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA

    35

    2019/C 406/46

    Case T-661/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v Commission

    36

    2019/C 406/47

    Case T-684/19: Action brought on 7 October 2019 — Magyar v Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal v ACER

    37

    2019/C 406/48

    Case T-695/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 –Falqui v Parliament

    39

    2019/C 406/49

    Case T-698/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FJ and Others v EEAS

    39

    2019/C 406/50

    Case T-699/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 — FT and Others v Commission

    40

    2019/C 406/51

    Case T-700/19: Action brought on 11 October 2019 – Al-Gaoud v Conseil

    41

    2019/C 406/52

    Case T-704/19: Action brought on 15 October 2019 - FGSZ v ACER

    42


     

    Corrigenda

    2019/C 406/53

    Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-279/19 (OJ C 220 of 1 July 2019)

    44


    EN

     

    Top