This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0120
Case T-120/17: Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)
Case T-120/17: Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)
Case T-120/17: Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)
OJ C 121, 18.4.2017, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/46 |
Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)
(Case T-120/17)
(2017/C 121/66)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Spyridonos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘fluo’ — Application for registration No 14 664 486
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2016 in Case R 863/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision in the part that it has rejected the trade mark in question and allow the trade mark to be registered for all the goods of class 9 of the Nice classification applied for; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the overall costs of the proceedings of all instances. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |