Šis dokumentas gautas iš interneto svetainės „EUR-Lex“
Dokumentas 62015TA0730
Case T-730/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO (Appeal — Civil service — EASO staff — Member of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Probationary period — Dismissal decision — Action for annulment and for damages — Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations)
Case T-730/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO (Appeal — Civil service — EASO staff — Member of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Probationary period — Dismissal decision — Action for annulment and for damages — Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations)
Case T-730/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO (Appeal — Civil service — EASO staff — Member of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Probationary period — Dismissal decision — Action for annulment and for damages — Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations)
OJ C 121, 18.4.2017, p. 27—28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 121/27 |
Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO
(Case T-730/15) (1)
((Appeal - Civil service - EASO staff - Member of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Probationary period - Dismissal decision - Action for annulment and for damages - Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations))
(2017/C 121/39)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: DI (represented by: I. Vlaic and G. Iliescu, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: W. Stevens, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F-113/13, EU:F:2015:120), seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F-113/13); |
|
2. |
Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which ruled on the present appeal; |
|
3. |
Reserves the costs. |