This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013FA0027
Case F-27/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Disciplinary procedure — Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority — Disciplinary penalty — Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion — Proportionality of the penalty)
Case F-27/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Disciplinary procedure — Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority — Disciplinary penalty — Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion — Proportionality of the penalty)
Case F-27/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Disciplinary procedure — Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority — Disciplinary penalty — Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion — Proportionality of the penalty)
OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p. 47–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.7.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 245/47 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015 — CX v Commission
(Case F-27/13) (1)
((Civil Service - Disciplinary procedure - Respective roles and powers of the Disciplinary Board and the Appointing Authority - Disciplinary penalty - Reduction in grade followed by a decision on promotion - Proportionality of the penalty))
(2015/C 245/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decisions to reduce the applicant to grade AD 8 under Article 9(1)(f) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations and a claim for damages for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders CX to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 207, 20.7.2013, p. 56.