Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010FN0120

    Case F-120/10: Action brought on 15 November 2010 — AR v Commission

    OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.3.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 72/35

    Action brought on 15 November 2010 — AR v Commission

    (Case F-120/10)

    2011/C 72/57

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: AR (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodriguez, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of EPSO’s decision not to admit the applicant to the procedure for internal competition COM/INT/EU2/10/AD5 for administrators with Bulgarian or Romanian citizenship on account of the fact that the applicant failed the admission tests and of the decision on the complaint authorising the applicant to re-sit the admission tests for the competition in question.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 31 March 2010 not to admit the applicant to internal competition COM/INT/EU2/10/AD5, so as to enable the applicant to sit the tests;

    —

    annul the decision adopted on 3 August 2010 by the appointing authority in that it did not uphold in its entirety the applicant’s complaint;

    —

    request the Commission, if necessary be means of a measure of inquiry or measure of organisation of procedure, to produce the list of questions asked and answers given at the tests held at 13.00 on 5 March 2010 in Brussels.

    —

    order the European Commission to pay the costs.
    Top