This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0132
Case F-132/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — Strack v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Articles 17, 17a and 19 of the Staff Regulations — Application for authorisation to disclose documents — Application for authorisation to publish a text — Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities — Admissibility)
Case F-132/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — Strack v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Articles 17, 17a and 19 of the Staff Regulations — Application for authorisation to disclose documents — Application for authorisation to publish a text — Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities — Admissibility)
Case F-132/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — Strack v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Articles 17, 17a and 19 of the Staff Regulations — Application for authorisation to disclose documents — Application for authorisation to publish a text — Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities — Admissibility)
OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 34–34
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
5.3.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 72/34 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 — Strack v Commission
(Case F-132/07) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Articles 17, 17a and 19 of the Staff Regulations - Application for authorisation to disclose documents - Application for authorisation to publish a text - Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities - Admissibility)
2011/C 72/54
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Civil service — Annulment of several Commission decisions rejecting the applicant's request for authorisation to publish certain documents and to bring a complaint against (ex-) Commissioners and Commission agents — Claim for damages.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
2. |
Orders Mr Strack to pay the costs in their entirety. |
(1) OJ C 107, 26.4.2008, p. 44.