Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62011TN0006

    Case T-6/11 P: Appeal brought on 5 January 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission

    OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.3.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 72/24

    Appeal brought on 5 January 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission

    (Case T-6/11 P)

    2011/C 72/40

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

    Other parties to the proceedings: Isabel Vicente Carbajosa (Brussels, Belgium), Niina Lehtinen (Brussels) and Myriam Menchen (Brussels)

    Form of order sought by the appellant

    The appellant claims that the Court should:

    —

    set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission;

    —

    refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal so that it may examine the grounds raised by the appellant seeking to have the judgment set aside;

    —

    reserve the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    The appellant puts forward two grounds in support of the appeal.

    1.

    First ground of appeal, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, the rights of the defence and the principle of legal certainty inasmuch as the Civil Service Tribunal upheld a plea which was not raised in the case at issue, or of the Tribunal's own motion, but in another case.

    2.

    Second ground of appeal, alleging in the alternative infringement of Articles 1, 5 and 7 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Union and of decisions creating the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), as well as infringement of the obligation to state reasons inasmuch as the Civil Service Tribunal wrongly held that EPSO did not have the power to admit the persons concerned onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application after the pre-selection phase.
    Top