This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0370
Case T-370/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2011 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Decision of the Commission to impose a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of application — Financial harm — Lack of exceptional circumstances — Lack of urgency)
Case T-370/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2011 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Decision of the Commission to impose a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of application — Financial harm — Lack of exceptional circumstances — Lack of urgency)
Case T-370/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2011 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Decision of the Commission to impose a fine — Bank guarantee — Application for suspension of application — Financial harm — Lack of exceptional circumstances — Lack of urgency)
OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
5.3.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 72/18 |
Order of the President of the General Court of 24 January 2011 — Rubinetterie Teorema v Commission
(Case T-370/10 R)
(Application for interim measures - Competition - Decision of the Commission to impose a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of application - Financial harm - Lack of exceptional circumstances - Lack of urgency)
2011/C 72/30
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Rubinetterie Teorema SpA (Flero, Italy) (represented by: R. Cavani, M. di Muro and P. Preda, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis, F. Castillo de la Torre and L. Malferrari, agents)
Re:
Application for suspension of application of Commission Decision C(2010) 3 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom fittings and fixtures).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application for suspension of application is rejected. |
|
2. |
The costs are reserved. |