(1)

In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, France’s application to register ‘Chevrotin’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

(2)

Italy opposed the registration under Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the grounds that the conditions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 were not complied with, that registration would be detrimental to other products on the market in Italy, in particular those called ‘caprino’, and that the translation in Italian of the name in question (caprino) was generic.

(3)

By letter of 7 December 2004 the Commission asked the Member States concerned to seek agreement among themselves in accordance with their internal procedures.

(4)

As no agreement was reached between France and Italy within three months, the Commission must adopt a decision in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 15 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.

(5)

However, France officially argued that registration of the name ‘Chevrotin’ would not lead to a ban on the use of the expression ‘de chèvre’ (goat) or ‘fromage de chèvre’ (goat cheese) to denominate cheese made from goat’s milk or, by the same token, use of the translation of these terms (in Italian, ‘caprino’ and ‘formaggio di capra’).

(6)

The term ‘chevrotin’ cannot be considered to be a translation of the term ‘caprino’ and, conversely, even if the term ‘caprino’ were generic as claimed by the Italian authorities, that does not imply that the term ‘chevrotin’ has become generic. Furthermore, Italy did not provide any evidence from which it may be concluded that the term ‘chevrotin’ itself is generic.

(7)

Finally, Italy did not provide any evidence of non-compliance with the conditions laid down in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.

(8)

In the light of the above, the name should thus be entered in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications.

(9)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Regulatory Committee on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs,