Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010FN0113

    Case F-113/10: Action brought on 2 November 2010 — AT v EACEA

    OJ C 72, 5.3.2011, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    02/11/2010
    Author:
    Civil Service Tribunal
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French

    5.3.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 72/35

    Action brought on 2 November 2010 — AT v EACEA

    (Case F-113/10)

    2011/C 72/56

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: AT (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

    Defendant: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Application for, first, annulment of the applicant’s career development report (CDR) for the period from 1 June to 31 December 2008; second, annulment of the contracting authority’s decision to terminate the applicant’s fixed-term employment contract before its due date, and, third, compensation for the damage suffered.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the applicant’s CDR for 2008, as adopted by the contracting authority’s decision of 29 October 2009;

    —

    annul the contracting authority’s decision of 12 February 2010 by which it terminated the applicant’s contract of employment; and, in so far as necessary,

    —

    annul the contracting authority’s decision rejecting the applicant’s complaints against his CDR for 2008 and the decision to terminate his contract; order the EACEA to pay an amount which should be no less than the amount of the applicant’s salary (and all the benefits provided for in the CEOS), calculated from the date on which the applicant’s employment ended on 12 February 2010 until the date of reinstatement within the agency as a result of the annulment of the decision to terminate his employment, by way of compensation for professional and financial damage, together with late payment interest at the statutory rate from the date of the judgment to be given;

    —

    order the EACEA to pay a sum fixed provisionally at EUR 10 000 by way of compensation for physical damage, together with late payment interest at the statutory rate from the date of the judgment to be given;

    —

    order the EACEA to pay a sum fixed provisionally and ex aequo et bono at EUR 50 000 by way of compensation for non-material damage, together with late payment interest at the statutory rate from the date of the judgment to be given;

    —

    in any event, order the EACEA to pay a sum fixed provisionally and ex aequo et bono at EUR 10 000 by way of compensation for the damage suffered as a result of the fact that a reasonable period was exceeded in preparing the CDR for 2008, together with late payment interest at the statutory rate from the date of the judgment to be given;

    —

    order the EACEA to pay the costs.
    Top