Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0630

Case T-630/22: Action brought on 10 October 2022 — Topper Argentina v EUIPO — Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology (wetoper)

OJ C 463, 5.12.2022, p. 56–56 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
10/10/2022
Date lodged:
10/10/2022
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
Spanish
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Defendant:
European Union Intellectual Property Office
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

5.12.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/56

Action brought on 10 October 2022 — Topper Argentina v EUIPO — Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology (wetoper)

(Case T-630/22)

(2022/C 463/82)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Topper Argentina, SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: J. M. Mora Cortés, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ningbo Xiangxinli Network Technology Co. Ltd (Qingdao, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark wetoper — EU trade mark No 18 249 968

Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2022 in Case R 2126/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO and the intervener (if it enters an appearance and intervenes in these proceedings) to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Operations Department and before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Top