This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CN0610
Case C-610/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pistoia (Italy) lodged on 23 September 2022 — QX v Agos Ducato S.p.A.
Case C-610/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pistoia (Italy) lodged on 23 September 2022 — QX v Agos Ducato S.p.A.
Case C-610/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pistoia (Italy) lodged on 23 September 2022 — QX v Agos Ducato S.p.A.
OJ C 482, 19.12.2022, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 23/09/2022
- Date lodged:
- 23/09/2022
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Italian
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Submits a preliminary question about 31987L0102 article 14 paragraph 2
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.12.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 482/7 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pistoia (Italy) lodged on 23 September 2022 — QX v Agos Ducato S.p.A.
(Case C-610/22)
(2022/C 482/10)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Tribunale di Pistoia
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: QX
Defendant: Agos Ducato S.p.A.
Question referred
Does ensuring ‘that the provisions which [Member States] adopt in implementation of [Directive 87/202] (1) are not circumvented as a result of the way in which agreements are formulated’, as is required by Article 14(2) of that directive, concern only failure to state the APR in an agreement, or does it concern also incorrect statement of the APR in an agreement?
(1) Council Directive 87/102/EEC of 22 December 1986 for the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning consumer credit (OJ 1987 L 42, p. 48).
