This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022CA0068
Case C-68/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Concept of ‘invalidity’ — Declaration of fitness to work — Unjustified absence — Action for annulment and for damages)
Case C-68/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Concept of ‘invalidity’ — Declaration of fitness to work — Unjustified absence — Action for annulment and for damages)
Case C-68/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL (Appeal — Civil service — Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) — Concept of ‘invalidity’ — Declaration of fitness to work — Unjustified absence — Action for annulment and for damages)
OJ C 63, 20.2.2023, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/12/2022
- Date lodged:
- 02/02/2022
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Staff cases, Appeal - unfounded
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62022CJ0068
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
20.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/10 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — European Investment Bank v KL
(Case C-68/22 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) - Concept of ‘invalidity’ - Declaration of fitness to work - Unjustified absence - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2023/C 63/12)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and by A. Duron, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: KL (represented by: A. Champetier and L. Levi, avocates)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by KL. |
