This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TN0564
Case T-564/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Bremino-Grupp v Council
Case T-564/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Bremino-Grupp v Council
Case T-564/21: Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Bremino-Grupp v Council
OJ C 490, 6.12.2021, p. 46–47
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
6.12.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 490/46 |
Action brought on 6 September 2021 — Bremino-Grupp v Council
(Case T-564/21)
(2021/C 490/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Bremino-Grupp OOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: A. Shmagin, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219I, p. 70), and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/997 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 219I, p. 3), in so far as those acts concern the applicant; |
— |
order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence and its right to effective judicial protection
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the restrictive measures are disproportionate
|