This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0553
Case C-553/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Fourth indent of Article 5 — Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use — Optional tax exemptions and reductions — Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of proportionality)
Case C-553/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Fourth indent of Article 5 — Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use — Optional tax exemptions and reductions — Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of proportionality)
Case C-553/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Fourth indent of Article 5 — Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use — Optional tax exemptions and reductions — Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of effectiveness — Principle of proportionality)
OJ C 63, 20.2.2023, p. 7–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 22/12/2022
- Date lodged:
- 08/09/2021
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021CJ0553
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
20.2.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 63/7 |
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Hauptzollamt Hamburg v Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH
(Case C-553/21) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Fourth indent of Article 5 - Differentiated rates of excise duty according to whether those products are for business or non-business use - Optional tax exemptions and reductions - Submission of an application for an optional tax reduction after the expiry of the period prescribed for that purpose but before the expiry of the period for assessment of the tax concerned - Principle of legal certainty - Principle of effectiveness - Principle of proportionality)
(2023/C 63/09)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Bundesfinanzhof
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Hauptzollamt Hamburg
Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH
Operative part of the judgment
The principle of effectiveness and the principle of proportionality, as a general principle of EU law, must be interpreted, in the context of implementing a provision such as that in the fourth indent of Article 5 of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity — which allows Member States to apply, under certain conditions, differentiated rates of taxation between business and non-business use, for energy products and electricity referred to in that directive — as precluding national legislation under which the competent authorities of a Member State are required to reject, automatically and without exception, an application for tax relief lodged within the period for assessment of the tax at issue as laid down in national law, on the sole ground that the applicant failed to comply with the period prescribed by that law for the submission of such an application.
