Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0706

Case T-706/18: Action brought on 28 November 2018 — Air Liquide Deutschland v Commission

OJ C 35, 28.1.2019, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
28/11/2018
Date lodged:
28/11/2018
Author:
General Court
Form:
Judicial information
Authentic language:
German
Type of procedure:
Action for annulment
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Case affecting:
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

28.1.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/32

Action brought on 28 November 2018 — Air Liquide Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-706/18)

(2019/C 35/39)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Air Liquide Deutschland GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Kachel and D. Fouquet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul in full the defendant’s Decision SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) of 28 May 2018 relating to Ref. C(2018) 3166 in respect of the years 2012 and 2013;

—

in the alternative, annul the defendant’s Decision SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) of 28 May 2018 relating to Ref. C(2018) 3166 insofar as it orders that, in respect of the years 2012 and 2013, baseload consumers with at least 7 000 hours of full use per year repay more than 20 % of published network charges, baseload consumers with at least 7 500 hours of full use per year repay more than 15 % of published network charges and baseload consumers with at least 8 000 hours of full use per year repay more than 10 % of published network charges;

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, including lawyers’ fees and travel expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are, in essence, either identical or similar to the pleas in law relied on in Case T-693/18, ZY v Commission.

Top