Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016FN0011

    Case F-11/16: Action brought on 19 February 2016 — ZZ v Commission

    OJ C 145, 25.4.2016, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    19/02/2016
    Date lodged:
    19/02/2016
    Author:
    Civil Service Tribunal
    Form:
    Judicial information
    Authentic language:
    French
    Type of procedure:
    Staff cases

    25.4.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 145/41

    Action brought on 19 February 2016 — ZZ v Commission

    (Case F-11/16)

    (2016/C 145/50)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Lhoest, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission

    Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

    Annulment of the Commission’s decision refusuing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer to the European Parliament and to reconstruct her career and an order that the Commission pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration paid to her and that which ought to be paid to her after the reconstruction of her career, together with interest for late payment.

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2015 refusing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer and to review her career at the European Commission from 16 June 2001 to 31 December 2010, despite the promotion from grade C4 (now AST 3) to grade C3 (now AST 4) granted to her by the European Parliament on 7 August 2009 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2000;

    —

    Annul the decision of the European Commission of 9 November 2015 rejecting the claim made by the applicant on 17 July 2015;

    —

    Order the European Commission to pay the applicant the difference between the remuneration which it paid to her and the remuneration which ought to be paid to her following the reconstruction of her career in grade and step, together with interest for late payment;

    —

    Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
    Top