This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TA0028
Case T-28/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 January 2011 — Park v OHIM — Bae (PINE TREE) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative Community mark PINE TREE — Genuine use of the mark — Articles 50(1)(a) and 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04 (now Articles 51(1)(a) and 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-28/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 January 2011 — Park v OHIM — Bae (PINE TREE) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative Community mark PINE TREE — Genuine use of the mark — Articles 50(1)(a) and 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04 (now Articles 51(1)(a) and 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Case T-28/09: Judgment of the General Court of 13 January 2011 — Park v OHIM — Bae (PINE TREE) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative Community mark PINE TREE — Genuine use of the mark — Articles 50(1)(a) and 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04 (now Articles 51(1)(a) and 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
OJ C 55, 19.2.2011, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 13/01/2011
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
19.2.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 55/21 |
Judgment of the General Court of 13 January 2011 — Park v OHIM — Bae (PINE TREE)
(Case T-28/09) (1)
(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Figurative Community mark PINE TREE - Genuine use of the mark - Articles 50(1)(a) and 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/04 (now Articles 51(1)(a) and 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 55/37
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mo-Hwa Park (Hillscheid, Germany) (represented by: P. Lee, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chong-Yun Bae (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A.-K. Warnecke and C. Donle, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2008 (Case R 1882/2007-4) concerning revocation proceedings between Mr Mo-Hwa Park and Mr Chong-Yun Bae.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Mo-Hwa Park to pay the costs.. |
