This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FA0114
Case F-114/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Europol staff — Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol — Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations — Assessment report)
Case F-114/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Europol staff — Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol — Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations — Assessment report)
Case F-114/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Europol staff — Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol — Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations — Assessment report)
OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 72–72
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.1.2010 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/72 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Rainer Wenning v European Police Office (Europol)
(Case F-114/07) (1)
(Civil Service - Europol staff - Renewal of contract of a member of the contract staff of Europol - Article 6 of the Europol Staff Regulations - Assessment report)
2010/C 24/131
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rainer Wenning (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers and subsequently by L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: B. Exterkate and D. El Khoury, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers, and subsequently by D. El Khoury and D. Neumann, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers)
Re:
Annulment of the decision of Europol of 21 December 2006 not to renew the applicant’s contract and not to reinstate him, and an order that Europol renew the applicant’s contract for a period of 4 years from 1 October 2007 and pay damages
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1. |
Dismisses the action. |
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 315, 22.12.2007, p. 47.