Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0562

Case T-562/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Noah Clothing v EUIPO — Noah (NOAH)

OJ C 418, 31.10.2022, p. 51–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

31.10.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/51

Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Noah Clothing v EUIPO — Noah (NOAH)

(Case T-562/22)

(2022/C 418/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Noah Clothing LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: W. Leppink, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yannick Noah (Feucherolles, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark NOAH — European Union trade mark No 5 620 968

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2022 in Case R 504/2021-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it rejects the application for a declaration of revocation with regard to the goods ‘polo shirts’ and ‘sweaters’ in Class 25;

—

annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the cross-appeal;

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 19(1), 3rd sentence, and Article 10(7) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 and with Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) and of Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the cross-appeal filed by the applicant before the Board of Appeal.
Top