Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022CN0598

    Case C-598/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 16 September 2022 — Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo and Others

    OJ C 463, 5.12.2022, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    5.12.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 463/19


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 16 September 2022 — Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl v Comune di Rosignano Marittimo and Others

    (Case C-598/22)

    (2022/C 463/26)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Consiglio di Stato

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl

    Respondents: Comune di Rosignano Marittimo, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia del demanio — Direzione regionale Toscana e Umbria, Regione Toscana

    Question referred

    Do Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and the principles arising from the Laezza judgment (C-375/14), where applicable, preclude the interpretation of a national provision such as Article 49 [of the Italian Shipping Code] as meaning that it results in the transfer without consideration and without compensation, by the concessionaire on expiry of the concession, when that concession has been renewed on an uninterrupted basis, where applicable by virtue of a new measure, of the building works constructed on the State-owned land forming part of the complex of assets organised for the operation of the resort enterprise, since that effect of immediate forfeiture could constitute a restriction that goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective actually pursued by the national legislature and is therefore disproportionate to the aim?


    Top