This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0507
Case T-507/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Migadakis v ENISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest — Video examination — Minimum points threshold — Equality of treatment — Whether marking was objective)
Case T-507/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Migadakis v ENISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest — Video examination — Minimum points threshold — Equality of treatment — Whether marking was objective)
Case T-507/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Migadakis v ENISA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Recruitment — Call for expressions of interest — Video examination — Minimum points threshold — Equality of treatment — Whether marking was objective)
OJ C 418, 31.10.2022, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
31.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 418/30 |
Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Migadakis v ENISA
(Case T-507/21) (1)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Call for expressions of interest - Video examination - Minimum points threshold - Equality of treatment - Whether marking was objective)
(2022/C 418/39)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Ioannis Migadakis (represented by: K. Bicard, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (represented by: I. Taurina, G. Pappa and C. Chalanouli, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbauer, lawyer)
Re:
By his action pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks to have set aside the decision of the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) of 30 October 2020 not to accept his application.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Mr. Ioannis Migadakis is ordered to pay the costs. |