Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TA0448

Case T-448/21: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Saure v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines — Action for annulment — Express decision adopted after implied refusal of access — No lis pendens on account of the inadmissibility of another action — Partial refusal of access — Exceptions relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, the protection of legal advice, the protection of the decision-making process and the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)

OJ C 418, 31.10.2022, p. 28–28 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

31.10.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 418/28


Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — Saure v Commission

(Case T-448/21) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines - Action for annulment - Express decision adopted after implied refusal of access - No lis pendens on account of the inadmissibility of another action - Partial refusal of access - Exceptions relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, the protection of legal advice, the protection of the decision-making process and the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)

(2022/C 418/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hans-Wilhelm Saure (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, G. Gattinara and A. Spina, acting as Agents)

Re:

By his action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the express decision of the European Commission of 2 June 2021, granting him full access to certain documents and partial access to other documents.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Mr Hans-Wilhelm Saure to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 412, 11.10.2021.


Top