This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0091
Case T-91/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage)
Case T-91/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage)
Case T-91/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Principle of good administration — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Reasonable time — Psychological harassment — Principle of legal certainty — Material and non-material damage)
OJ C 418, 31.10.2022, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
31.10.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 418/17 |
Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — WT v Commission
(Case T-91/20) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Principle of good administration - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons - Reasonable time - Psychological harassment - Principle of legal certainty - Material and non-material damage)
(2022/C 418/20)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: WT (represented by: V. Villante, D. Rovetta and D. Birkenmaier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 17 April 2019 by which the Commission imposed on her a disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand and, second, compensation for the non-material and material damage which she claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders WT to pay the costs. |