Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CN0430

    Case C-430/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 November 2009 — Euro Tyre Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    OJ C 24, 30.1.2010, p. 23–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    30.1.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 24/23


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 2 November 2009 — Euro Tyre Holding B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    (Case C-430/09)

    2010/C 24/42

    Language of the case: Dutch

    Referring court

    Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Euro Tyre Holding B.V.

    Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

    Question referred

    In the light of Article 28c(A)(a) of the Sixth Directive, (1) and of Article 8(1)(a) and (b), the first subparagraph of Article 28a(1)(a), and the first subparagraph of Article 28b(A)(a) of the Sixth Directive, where, with regard to the same goods, two successive supplies are effected between taxable persons acting as such, in respect of which there is one single intra-Community dispatch or one single intra-Community transport, how should one determine to which supply the intra-Community transport should be ascribed, when the transport of the goods is effected by or at the expense of the person who acts both in the capacity of purchaser for the first supply and in the capacity of vendor in the second supply?


    (1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment.

    (OJ 1997 L 145, p. 1).


    Top