This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CA0523
Case C-523/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)) — proceedings brought by A (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Substantive scope — Definition of civil matters — Decision relating to the taking into care and placement of children outside the family home — Child’s habitual residence — Protective measures — Jurisdiction)
Case C-523/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)) — proceedings brought by A (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Substantive scope — Definition of civil matters — Decision relating to the taking into care and placement of children outside the family home — Child’s habitual residence — Protective measures — Jurisdiction)
Case C-523/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)) — proceedings brought by A (Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Substantive scope — Definition of civil matters — Decision relating to the taking into care and placement of children outside the family home — Child’s habitual residence — Protective measures — Jurisdiction)
OJ C 141, 20.6.2009, p. 14–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
20.6.2009 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 141/14 |
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2009 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland)) — proceedings brought by A
(Case C-523/07) (1)
(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Substantive scope - Definition of ‘civil matters’ - Decision relating to the taking into care and placement of children outside the family home - Child’s habitual residence - Protective measures - Jurisdiction)
2009/C 141/22
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Korkein hallinto-oikeus
Party to the main proceedings
Applicant: A
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Interpretation of Articles 1(2)(d), 8(1), 13(1) and 20(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1) — Enforcement of a single decision concerning the immediate taking into care of a child and placement outside the family home, adopted as a public-law decision in connection with child protection — Situation of a child with a permanent residence in one Member State but staying in another Member State with no fixed dwelling place
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, must be interpreted as meaning that a decision ordering that a child be immediately taken into care and placed outside his original home is covered by the term ‘civil matters’, for the purposes of that provision, where that decision was adopted in the context of public law rules relating to child protection. |
|
2. |
The concept of ‘habitual residence’ under Article 8(1) of Regulation No 2201/2003 must be interpreted as meaning that it corresponds to the place which reflects some degree of integration by the child in a social and family environment. To that end, in particular the duration, regularity, conditions and reasons for the stay on the territory of a Member State and the family’s move to that State, the child’s nationality, the place and conditions of attendance at school, linguistic knowledge and the family and social relationships of the child in that State must be taken into consideration. It is for the national court to establish the habitual residence of the child, taking account of all the circumstances specific to each individual case. |
|
3. |
A protective measure, such as the taking into care of children, may be decided by a national court under Article 20 of Regulation No 2201/2003 if the following conditions are satisfied:
The taking of the measure and its binding nature are determined in accordance with national law. After the protective measure has been taken, the national court is not required to transfer the case to the court of another Member State having jurisdiction. However, in so far as the protection of the best interests of the child so requires, the national court which has taken provisional or protective measures must inform, directly or through the central authority designated under Article 53 of Regulation No 2201/2003, the court of another Member State having jurisdiction. |
|
4. |
Where the court of a Member State does not have jurisdiction at all, it must declare of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction, but is not required to transfer the case to another court. However, in so far as the protection of the best interests of the child so requires, the national court which has declared of its own motion that it has no jurisdiction must inform, directly or through the central authority designated under Article 53 of Regulation No 2201/2003, the court of another Member State having jurisdiction. |