Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/224/34

    Case C-209/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Canon Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld

    JO C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 19–19 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.9.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 224/19


    Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Canon Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld

    (Case C-209/06)

    (2006/C 224/34)

    Language of the case: German

    Referring court

    Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Applicant: Canon Deutschland GmbH

    Defendant: Hauptzollamt Krefeld

    Question referred

    Should a camcorder, which at the time of importation is unable to record video signals from an external source, be classified under subheading 8525 4099 of the Combined Nomenclature, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by using certain software, even though the manufacturer and the seller neither have mentioned nor support this possibility? (1)


    (1)  Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and of the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).


    Top