EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/143/28

Case C-495/04: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) — A.C. Smits-Koolhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (Directive 95/59 — Tax on the consumption of manufactured tobacco — Herbal cigarettes — Used exclusively for medical purposes)

JO C 143, 17.6.2006, p. 16–16 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

17.6.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/16


Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 March 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden) — A.C. Smits-Koolhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-495/04) (1)

(Directive 95/59 - Tax on the consumption of manufactured tobacco - Herbal cigarettes - Used exclusively for medical purposes)

(2006/C 143/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: A.C. Smits-Koolhoven

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Art. 7(2) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco (OJ 1995 L 291, p. 40 — Medicinal cigarettes — Exclusively medical purpose — Therapeutic or prophylactic purposes

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7(2) of Council Directive 95/59/EC of 27 November 1995 on taxes other than turnover taxes which affect the consumption of manufactured tobacco must be interpreted as meaning that cigarettes without tobacco which do not contain substances having a medical effect but which are presented and marketed as an aid to giving up smoking are not ‘used exclusively for medical purposes’ within the meaning of the second subparagraph of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.


Top