Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/224/94

    Case T-137/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2006 — Mayer and Others v Commission (Council Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Commission Decision 2004/69/EC — List of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region — Action for annulment — Inadmissible)

    JO C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 44–44 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.9.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 224/44


    Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2006 — Mayer and Others v Commission

    (Case T-137/04) (1)

    (Council Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Commission Decision 2004/69/EC - List of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region - Action for annulment - Inadmissible)

    (2006/C 224/94)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicants: Kurt Martin Mayer (Eisentratten, Austria), Tilly Forstbetriebe GmbH (Treibach, Austria), Anton Volpini de Maestri (Spittal/Drau, Austria) and Johannes Volpini de Maestri (Seeboden, Austria) (represented by: M. Schaffgotsch, lawyer)

    Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: T Pynnä and A. Guimaraes-Purokowski, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/69/EC of 22 December 2003 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 14, p. 21).

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The action is dismissed as inadmissible

    2.

    The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

    3.

    The Republic of Finland is ordered to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 146 of 29.5.2004.


    Top