This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TJ0625
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2015.#The Tea Board v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Figurative mark Darjeeling collection de lingerie — Earlier Community collective word and figurative marks DARJEELING — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-625/13.
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Oitava Secção) de 2 de outubro de 2015.
The Tea Board contra Instituto de Harmonização do Mercado Interno (marcas, desenhos e modelos) (IHMI).
Marca comunitária — Processo de oposição — Marca figurativa Darjeeling collection de lingerie — Marcas comunitárias coletivas, nominativa e figurativa, anteriores DARJEELING — Motivos relativos de recusa — Artigo 8.°, n.° 1, alínea b), e n.° 5, do Regulamento (CE) n.° 207/2009.
Processo T-625/13.
Acórdão do Tribunal Geral (Oitava Secção) de 2 de outubro de 2015.
The Tea Board contra Instituto de Harmonização do Mercado Interno (marcas, desenhos e modelos) (IHMI).
Marca comunitária — Processo de oposição — Marca figurativa Darjeeling collection de lingerie — Marcas comunitárias coletivas, nominativa e figurativa, anteriores DARJEELING — Motivos relativos de recusa — Artigo 8.°, n.° 1, alínea b), e n.° 5, do Regulamento (CE) n.° 207/2009.
Processo T-625/13.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2015:742
- Date of document:
- 02/10/2015
- Date lodged:
- 25/11/2013
- Author:
- Tribunal Geral
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Países terceiros
- Form:
- Acórdão
- Additional information:
- POURVOI C-674/15 P
- Authentic language:
- inglês
- Type of procedure:
- Recurso de anulação - não fundamentado, Recurso de anulação - fundamentado
- Applicant:
- Particular
- Defendant:
- Instituições e organismos da UE, Instituto da Propriedade Intelectual da União Europeia
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Gratsias
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62013TA0625
- Confirmed by 62015CJ0673
- Review of judgement requested by 62015CN0674
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 32006R0510-A14: N 48
- 32006R0510: N 48
- 32009R0207: N 1 43
- 32009R0207-A65: N 18
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 19 - 26 30 32 35 - 37 48 51 - 61 124
- 32009R0207-A08P5: N 19 48 64 71 74 - 82 86 89 - 101 121 132 137 138 146 - 151
- 32009R0207-A66P2: N 20 - 22 34 38 41 - 46 52 60 76 109 110
- 32009R0207-A66: N 33
- 32009R0207-A66P1: N 33 34 41
- 32009R0207-A66P3: N 33 35 42
- 32009R0207-A07P1LC: N 34 42 52
- 32009R0207-C8: N 40
- 32009R0207-A67P2: N 45
- 32009R0207-A71: N 45
- 32009R0207-A07P1LK: N 48
- 61995CJ0251-N24: N 62
- 61997CC0108-N36: N 111
- 61997CC0108-N46: N 111
- 61997CJ0039-N22: N 58
- 61997CJ0039-N18: N 62
- 61997CJ0108-N1: N 111
- 62001TJ0295-N33: N 111
- 62003TJ0215-N35: N 66
- 62003TJ0215-N36: N 94
- 62003TJ0215-N46: N 97
- 62004TJ0067-N41: N 68
- 62004TJ0346-N19: N 18
- 62004TJ0477-N48: N 29 74
- 62004TJ0477-N49: N 75
- 62005CO0235-N35: N 57
- 62005TJ0158-N63: N 47
- 62006CJ0016-N65: N 37
- 62006TJ0128-N58: N 110
- 62006TJ0128-N62: N 119
- 62006TJ0128-N65: N 124
- 62006TJ0128-N66: N 136
- 62007CJ0252-N35: N 71
- 62007CJ0252-N42: N 81 87
- 62007CJ0252-N71: N 96
- 62007CJ0320-N46: N 71
- 62007CJ0320-N47: N 71
- 62007CJ0320-N48: N 71
- 62007CJ0487-N40: N 114
- 62007CJ0487-N41: N 123
- 62007CJ0487-N39: N 99
- 62008CJ0202-N40: N 40
- 62008CO0136-N26: N 87
- 62008CO0136-N27: N 88
- 62009CJ0096-N147: N 41
- 62009TJ0138-N25: N 32
- 62009TJ0138-N22: N 35
- 62009TJ0138-N26: N 41
- 62009TJ0138-N27: N 41
- 62009TJ0373-N58: N 75
- 62009TJ0408-N29: N 24
- 62009TJ0408-N37: N 25
- 62009TJ0408-N38: N 25
- 62009TJ0487-N20: N 26
- 62010CO0216-N26: N 36
- 62010TJ0060-N56: N 123
- 62010TJ0060-N54: N 125
- 62010TJ0060-N21: N 87
- 62010TJ0060-N20: N 96
- 62010TJ0534-N52: N 108
- 62010TJ0534-N51: N 42
- 62010TJ0586-N58: N 66
- 62011CJ0100-N95: N 97
- 62011TJ0143-N19: N 36
- 62011TJ0143-N61: N 59
- 62011TJ0353-N40: N 37
- 62011TJ0357-N43: N 125 134
- 62011TJ0357-N29: N 68
- 62011TJ0522-N32: N 37
- 62011TJ0525-N18: N 67
- 62012CJ0252-N36: N 62
- 62012CJ0252-N39: N 81 125
- 62012CJ0383-N34: N 100
- 62012CJ0383-N37: N 101
- 62012CJ0383-N40: N 102
- 62012CJ0383-N42: N 102
- 62012CJ0383-N43: N 102
- 62012CJ0383: N 104
- 62012CO0266-N45: N 18
- 62012CO0294-N69: N 139
- 62012CO0393-N36: N 108
- 62012CO0393-N33: N 109
- 62012TJ0288-N59: N 97
- 62012TJ0328-N62: N 58
- 62012TJ0480-N92: N 151
- 62012TJ0480-N26: N 68
- 62013TJ0308-N38: N 50
- 62014CO0091-N23: N 57
- Notes relating to the decision:
-
- 1. Winters, Kevin: Trade marks: Trade marks and geographical indications retain distinct functions in intellectual property law, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice 2016 p.157-159 (EN)
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
