EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62001TJ0295
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2003. # Nordmilch eG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - OLDENBURGER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Geographical origin - Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) - Limitation of the right conferred - Article 12(b) - Statement as to the scope of protection - Article 38(2). # Case T-295/01.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2003.
Nordmilch eG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - OLDENBURGER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Geographical origin - Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) - Limitation of the right conferred - Article 12(b) - Statement as to the scope of protection - Article 38(2).
Case T-295/01.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2003.
Nordmilch eG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - OLDENBURGER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Geographical origin - Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) - Limitation of the right conferred - Article 12(b) - Statement as to the scope of protection - Article 38(2).
Case T-295/01.
European Court Reports 2003 II-04365
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2003:267
«(Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – OLDENBURGER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Geographical origin – Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) – Limitation of the right conferred – Article 12(b) – Statement as to the scope of protection – Article 38(2))»
|
||||
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(1)(c))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 7(1)(c) and 12(b))
(Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 38(2))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
15 October 2003 (1)
((Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – OLDENBURGER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Geographical origin – Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(2) – Limitation of the right conferred – Article 12(b) – Statement as to the scope of protection – Article 38(2)))
In Case T-295/01, Nordmilch eG, established in Zeven (Germany), represented by C. Spintig, lawyer,applicant,
v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. von Mühlendahl and G. Schneider, acting as Agents,defendant,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 September 2001 (Case R 826/2000-3), concerning the application for registration of the word OLDENBURGER,THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 26 March 2003,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
hereby:
Tiili |
Mengozzi |
Vilaras |
H. Jung |
V. Tiili |
Registrar |
President |