This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 92003E003688
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia.
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03 by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission. Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia.
Dz.U. C 84E z 3.4.2004, p. 85–85
(ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, IT, NL, PT, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 09/12/2003; Data przesłania
- Date of dispatch:
- 09/12/2003
- Date of reply:
- 15/01/2004; Wspólna odpowiedź pisemna
- Author:
- Parlament Europejski, Not available
- Form:
- Pisemne zapytanie
- Addressee:
- Komisja Europejska
- Parliamentary term:
- piąta kadencja
- Political group:
- Grupa Unii na rzecz Europy Narodów
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
3.4.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
CE 84/85 |
(2004/C 84 E/0097)
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3688/03
by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission
(9 December 2003)
Subject: Update on use of funding from the Ecos-Ouverture II programme by the municipality of Perugia
In its answer to question E-1110/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Perugia had submitted projects and secured funding under the Ecos-Ouverture programme, the Commission stated that the city had applied twice, in 1997 and 1999, but that it had not received funding in either case.
Can the Commission say why the projects were not considered suitable?
Has the Commission completed its examination of the final reports mentioned in its answers and, if so, can it supply any information on the outcome?
(1) OJ C 11 E, 15.1.2004, p. 139.
