Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/224/81

    Case T-252/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 July 2006 — Caviar Anzali v OHIM — Novomarket (Asetra) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative trade mark ASETRA — Previous national and international figurative trade mark CAVIAR ASTARA — Relative grounds for refusal — Risk of confusion — Rejection of opposition for failure to produce documents within the prescribed periods — Evidence produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Admissibility — Scope of the examination conducted by the Boards of Appeal — Articles 62 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    ĠU C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 38–38 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.9.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 224/38


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 July 2006 — Caviar Anzali v OHIM — Novomarket (Asetra)

    (Case T-252/04) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative trade mark ASETRA - Previous national and international figurative trade mark CAVIAR ASTARA - Relative grounds for refusal - Risk of confusion - Rejection of opposition for failure to produce documents within the prescribed periods - Evidence produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Admissibility - Scope of the examination conducted by the Boards of Appeal - Articles 62 and 74 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

    (2006/C 224/81)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Caviar Anzali SAS (Colombes, France) (represented by: J.-F. Jésus, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M.A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Novomarket, SA (Madrid, Spain)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 April 2004 (Case R 479/2003-2) concerning the opposition proceedings between Caviar Anzali SAS and Novomarket, SA

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 April 2004 (Case R 479/2003-2);

    2.

    Orders OHIM to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 217, 28.8.2004.


    Top