Edizzjoni Speċjali biċ-Ċek: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bl-Estonjan: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Letton: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Litwan: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bl-Ungeriż Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Malti: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Pollakk: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bis-Slovakk: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bis-Sloven: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bil-Bulgaru: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni Speċjali bir-Rumen: Kapitolu 10 Volum 001 P. 8 - 9
Edizzjoni speċjali bil-Kroat: Kapitolu 10 Volum 003 P. 5 - 6
English
Select your language
Official EU languages:
Access to European Union law
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Need more search options? Use the
Advanced search
Document 21978A1110(02)
Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Bank for International Settlements concerning the mobilization of claims held by the Member States under the medium-term financial assistance arrangement
Ftehim fil-forma ta' skambju ta' ittri bejn il-Komunità Ekonomika Ewropea u l-Bank għal Ftehimijiet Internazzjonali li jikkonċerna l-mobilizzazzjoni ta' prestensjonijiet miżmuma mill-Istati Membri taħt l-arranġamenti ta' għajnuna finanzjarja fuq skond medju
Ftehim fil-forma ta' skambju ta' ittri bejn il-Komunità Ekonomika Ewropea u l-Bank għal Ftehimijiet Internazzjonali li jikkonċerna l-mobilizzazzjoni ta' prestensjonijiet miżmuma mill-Istati Membri taħt l-arranġamenti ta' għajnuna finanzjarja fuq skond medju
ĠU L 316, 10.11.1978, p. 22–23
(DA, DE, EN, FR, IT, NL) Dan id-dokument ġie ppubblikat f’edizzjoni(jiet) speċjali
(CS, ET, LV, LT, HU, MT, PL, SK, SL, BG, RO, HR)
In force
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/1978/897/oj
Language
HTML
PDF
Official Journal
|
10.11.1978 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Communities |
L 316/22 |
AGREEMENT
in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Economic Community and the Bank for International Settlements concerning the mobilization of claims held by the Member States under the medium-term financial assistance arrangements
Sir,
The BIS could conclude stand-by credit agreements with the creditor countries' central banks if they should so request.
These agreements could be concluded up to the total amount of the contribution paid into the mechanism by the creditor country, with an overall limit of 2 725 million units of account, corresponding to half of the total of future commitment ceilings of the member countries.
The practical details of each stand-by agreement would be determined by agreement between the BIS and the central bank in question. However, certain conditions, which the BIS would be prepared to apply, can be indicated already:
The initial commitment of the BIS for each stand-by credit would be for two years with the option of renewal for other periods, the total not to exceed five years.
On the opening of credits, and whenever they are renewed, the BIS would take a commission. It would also be understood that, in order to allow it to carry out the necessary adjustments to its own liquidity, the first drawings would not take place until one month after the conclusion of the stand-by agreement. Drawings would be in the currencies available to the BIS at the time the agreements were concluded, most probably in US dollars; they would be for periods to be negotiated in the light of the Bank's resources, probably three or six months. The conditions would be equivalent to those applied by the BIS at the time for transactions concluded on similar terms, i. e. at close to market rates. Normally, these rates should be only slightly above Libor. However, if the BIS should itself have to have recourse to the market to procure the necessary funds, the rate applied could reach a maximum equivalent to Libor plus an appropriate margin.
I should be obliged if you would inform me whether the Council of the European Communities is in agreement with the above.
Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.
For the Bank for International Settlements
Sir,
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your letter of today's date, which reads as follows:
‘The BIS could conclude stand-by credit agreements with the creditor countries' central banks if they should so request.
These agreements could be concluded up to the total amount of the contribution paid into the mechanism by the creditor country, with an overall limit of 2 725 million units of account, corresponding to half of the total of future commitment ceilings of the member countries.
The practical details of each stand-by agreement would be determined by agreement between the BIS and the central bank in question. However, certain conditions, which the BIS would be prepared to apply, can be indicated already:
The initial commitment of the BIS for each stand-by credit would be for two years with the option of renewal for other periods, the total not to exceed five years.
On the opening of credits, and whenever they are renewed, the BIS would take a commission. It would also be understood that, in order to allow it to carry out the necessary adjustments to its own liquidity, the first drawings would not take place until one month after the conclusion of the stand-by agreement. Drawings would be in the currencies available to the BIS at the time the agreements were concluded, most probably in US dollars; they would be for periods to be negotiated in the light of the Bank's resources, probably three or six months. The conditions would be equivalent to those applied by the BIS at the time for transactions concluded on similar terms, i. e. at close to market rates. Normally, these rates should be only slightly above Libor. However, if the BIS should itself have to have recourse to the market to procure the necessary funds, the rate applied could reach a maximum equivalent to Libor plus an appropriate margin.
I should be obliged if you would inform me whether the Council of the European Communities is in agreement with the above.’
I have the honour to inform you that the Council of the European Communities is in agreement with the contents of your letter.
Please accept, Sir, the assurance of my highest consideration.
On behalf of the Council of the European Communities