This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/224/33
Case C-208/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
Case C-208/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
Case C-208/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
SL C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 18–18
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.9.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 224/18 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
(Case C-208/06)
(2006/C 224/33)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Medion AG
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg
Question referred
Should a camcorder, which at the time of importation (1) is unable to record video signals from an external source, be classified under subheading 8525 4099 of the Combined Nomenclature, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by means of activating certain switches, even though the manufacturer and the seller neither have mentioned nor support this possibility?
(1) Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).