Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TN0321

    Case T-321/10: Action brought on 4 August 2010 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)

    SL C 260, 25.9.2010, p. 25–25 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.9.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 260/25


    Action brought on 4 August 2010 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)

    (Case T-321/10)

    ()

    2010/C 260/34

    Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: SA.PAR. Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bussoletti and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Salini Costruttori SpA (Rome, Italy)

    Form of order sought

    declare the present action admissible;

    annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 on the grounds of breach of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and of a deficient statement of reasons;

    order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before the Board of Appeal.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘GRUPPO SALINI’ (registration application No 3 832 161) for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

    Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

    Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: SALINI COSTRUTTORI SpA.

    Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: Well-known trade mark in Italy, de facto trade mark, domain name and company name of ‘SALINI’ for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

    Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division and declaration of nullity of the Community trade mark.

    Pleas in law: Breach of Article 53(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c), of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, breach of Article 52(1)(b) of that regulation, and deficient statement of reasons.


    Top