This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010CB0369
Case C-369/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Community word mark MEMORY — Invalidity proceedings — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c))
Case C-369/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Community word mark MEMORY — Invalidity proceedings — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c))
Case C-369/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Community word mark MEMORY — Invalidity proceedings — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c))
SL C 252, 27.8.2011, p. 10–10
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/10 |
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA
(Case C-369/10 P) (1)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Community word mark MEMORY - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c))
2011/C 252/18
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-108/09 Ravensburger v OHIM, by which the Court dismissed the action brought against Decision R 305/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the Cancellation Division’s decision which declares the word mark ‘MEMORY’ invalid, in respect of goods in Classes 9 and 28, in the context of the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by Educa Borras
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs. |