This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009FA0030
Case F-30/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 13 April 2011 –Chaouch v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Establishment of entitlement — Entry into service as probationary official — Change of residence after establishment to be taken into account — Official’s duty of residence under Article 20 of the Staff Regulations)
Case F-30/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 13 April 2011 –Chaouch v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Establishment of entitlement — Entry into service as probationary official — Change of residence after establishment to be taken into account — Official’s duty of residence under Article 20 of the Staff Regulations)
Case F-30/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 13 April 2011 –Chaouch v Commission (Civil service — Remuneration — Installation allowance — Establishment of entitlement — Entry into service as probationary official — Change of residence after establishment to be taken into account — Official’s duty of residence under Article 20 of the Staff Regulations)
SL C 252, 27.8.2011, p. 49–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/49 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 13 April 2011 –Chaouch v Commission
(Case F-30/09) (1)
(Civil service - Remuneration - Installation allowance - Establishment of entitlement - Entry into service as probationary official - Change of residence after establishment to be taken into account - Official’s duty of residence under Article 20 of the Staff Regulations)
2011/C 252/105
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Dhikra Chaouch (Oetrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Appointing Authority’s decision not to grant the applicant installation allowance
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses Mr. Chaouch’s action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr. Chaouch to pay all the costs. |
(1) OJ C 129 of 06.06.2009, p. 21.