Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0243

    Case T-243/08: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Ravensburger v OHIM — Educa Borras (EDUCA Memory game) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark EDUCA Memory game — Earlier national and international word marks MEMORY — Relative ground for refusal — Lack of similarity between the signs — Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 74 and 75 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 76 and 77 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    SL C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 35–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.7.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 179/35


    Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Ravensburger v OHIM — Educa Borras (EDUCA Memory game)

    (Case T-243/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark EDUCA Memory game - Earlier national and international word marks MEMORY - Relative ground for refusal - Lack of similarity between the signs - Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 74 and 75 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b) and (5), 76 and 77 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    (2010/C 179/60)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Ravensburger AG (Ravensburg, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Educa Borras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2008 (Case R 597/2007-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Ravensburger AG and Educa Borras, SA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action.

    2.

    Orders Ravensburger AG to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 209, 15.8.2008.


    Top