Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/224/14

Case C-519/04 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2006 — David Meca-Medina, Igor Majcen v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland (Appeal — Rules adopted by the International Olympic Committee concerning doping control — Incompatibility with the Community rules on competition and freedom to provide services — Complaint — Rejection)

SL C 224, 16.9.2006, p. 8–8 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.9.2006   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/8


Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2006 — David Meca-Medina, Igor Majcen v Commission of the European Communities, Republic of Finland

(Case C-519/04 P) (1)

(Appeal - Rules adopted by the International Olympic Committee concerning doping control - Incompatibility with the Community rules on competition and freedom to provide services - Complaint - Rejection)

(2006/C 224/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: David Meca-Medina, Igor Majcen (represented by: J.-L. Dupont and M.-A. Lucas, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: O. Beynet and A. Bouquet, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendants: Republic of Finland (represented by: T Pynnä, Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 30 September 2004 in Case T-313/02 Meca-Medina and Majcen v Commission, dismissing as unfounded an application for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint following a proceeding pursuant to Articles 81 EC and 82 of the EC Treaty — Anti-doping rules

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 30 September 2004 in Case T-313/02 Meca-Medina and Majcen v Commission;

2.

Dismisses the action under No T-313/02 brought before the Court of First Instance for annulment of the Commission's decision of 1 August 2002 rejecting the complaint lodged by Mr Meca-Medina and Mr Majcen;

3.

Orders Mr Meca-Medina and Mr Majcen to pay the costs relating both to the present proceedings and to the proceedings brought before the Court of First Instance;

4.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.


Top