Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0260

    Case T-260/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2012 — Indo Internacional v OHIM — Visual (VISUAL MAP) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark VISUAL MAP — Earlier national word mark VISUAL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    SL C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 12–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.3.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 65/12


    Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2012 — Indo Internacional v OHIM — Visual (VISUAL MAP)

    (Case T-260/08) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark VISUAL MAP - Earlier national word mark VISUAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    2012/C 65/21

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Indo Internacional, SA (Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain) (represented: initially by X. Fàbrega Sabaté and M. Curell Aguilà, and subsequently by M. Curell Aguilà and J. Güell Serra, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann and R. Manea, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Visual SA (Saint-Apollinaire, France)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 (Case R 700/2007-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Visual SA and Indo Internacional, SA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The General Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Indo Internacional, SA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 223, 30.8.2008.


    Top