Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Martínez Albainox, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TASER – Earlier EU word marks TASER – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-341/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.
Martínez Albainox, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TASER – Earlier EU word marks TASER – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-341/19.

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.
Martínez Albainox, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark TASER – Earlier EU word marks TASER – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Detriment to reputation – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-341/19.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:233