EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2018/103/09

Corrigendum to 2018 Call for proposals — Multi programmes — Grants to information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ C 9, 12.1.2018)

IO C 103, 19.3.2018, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

19.3.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/8


Corrigendum to 2018 Call for proposals — Multi programmes — Grants to information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council

( Official Journal of the European Union C 9 of 12 January 2018 )

(2018/C 103/09)

On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, first sentence:

for:

‘12 April 2018’,

read:

‘19 April 2018’.

On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, in the table:

for:

‘(d)

    Deadline for submitting applications 12.4.2018’,

read:

‘(d)

    Deadline for submitting applications 19.4.2018’.

On page 43, Section 8.2, ‘Operational capacity’, the third paragraph is deleted.

On page 44, Section 9, ‘Award criteria’, second last paragraph, numbered list (a), (b) and (c):

for:

‘… criteria:

(a)

the total of the remaining foreseen amount for the three topics on the internal market shall be allocated to the projects targeting the internal market with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied;

(b)

the same approach shall be taken for proposals targeting third countries (Topics 4–6);

(c)

if the foreseen amount is still not exhausted, the remaining amounts for both internal market and third countries shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the priority and topic for which they have applied.’,

read:

‘… criterion:

the total of the remaining foreseen amount for all four topics shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied.’.

On page 46, Section 11.4, ‘Funding forms, eligible and ineligible costs’, under ‘Eligible costs’, first indent:

for:

‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par.1, 2 and 3).’,

read:

‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par. 1 and 2).’.


Top