EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0728
Case T-728/19: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service — Partial refusal of access — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
Case T-728/19: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service — Partial refusal of access — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
Case T-728/19: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service — Partial refusal of access — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
IO C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 50–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.1.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 28/50 |
Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission
(Case T-728/19) (1)
(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service - Partial refusal of access - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
(2021/C 28/76)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis and J. Van Rossum, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier, I. Melo Sampaio and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 13 August and 26 September 2019 refusing in part the disclosure of the documents requested by the applicant.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
PL is ordered to pay the costs. |