EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TA0874
Case T-874/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties — Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-874/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties — Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-874/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties — Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
IO C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.1.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 28/44 |
Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties)
(Case T-874/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties - Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 28/67)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Impera GmbH (Steinhaus, Austria) (represented by: C. Straberger, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: I. Lecheva, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Euro Games Technology Ltd (Vranya-Lozen-Triugulnika, Bulgaria) (represented by: K. Manev, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2019 (Case R 2304/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Euro Games Technology and Impera.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Impera GmbH to pay the costs. |